MODELS
← Browse the encyclopedia

Encyclopedia · Free preview

Who Is the Author of Spamlet?

Dennett imagines a constructed creator, Spakesheare, producing a play, Spamlet, and asks where the creative design work occurs. A stored play and a system performing substantive creative search invite different attribution judgments.

In Dennett's Spamlet thought experiment, a maker constructs an artificial creator that then produces a play. The question is where the relevant creative work occurred: was the play already stored by the maker, or did the created system contribute a substantial process of exploration and selection? The scenario concerns attribution of design work, not a spam filter accidentally printing Shakespeare.

The useful move is to inspect contribution rather than decide authorship solely from material composition or the fact that someone built the producer. Producing a finished artifact can include conception, generating candidates, selecting, revising, and realizing the result. These roles may be distributed. A philosophical account of creative contribution does not by itself establish legal authorship, ownership, consciousness, or moral responsibility.

When to use it

When discussing distributed creative work, tool-mediated production, or the assumptions behind authorship judgments.

How it can help

Trace conception, generation, selection, revision, and delivery rather than inferring contribution solely from who built the producer or presented the final artifact.

Keep exploring

Read the full page.

Create your free access to continue reading and explore the complete library.

Register free with ChatGPT →

Already registered? Use the same button to sign in.

Sign-in shares your email with Michael Simmons to create your site access. No payment required. Newsletter signup is separate. How your data is used