Encyclopedia · Free preview
Process vs Outcome Thinking
The discipline of evaluating decisions by the quality of the decision process rather than the outcome. A good process can produce a bad outcome (bad luck), and a bad process can produce a good outcome (good luck). Over many decisions, good processes reliably produce better outcomes than bad processes. Annie Duke's work on 'resulting'—judging decisions by outcomes—shows this is one of the most persistent decision-making errors, especially in domains with high variance.
When to use it
When facing strategic decisions under uncertainty; when multiple stakeholders have competing interests; when the stakes are high and reversibility is low.
How it can help
Provides frameworks for navigating competitive landscapes, allocating resources under uncertainty, and making high-stakes decisions with incomplete information.
Keep exploring
Read the full page.
Create your free access to continue reading and explore the complete library.
Register free with ChatGPT →Already registered? Use the same button to sign in.
Sign-in shares your email with Michael Simmons to create your site access. No payment required. Newsletter signup is separate. How your data is used