Nature vs. Nurture
Genetic and environmental factors can contribute to complex traits, sometimes through interactions and correlations
People, books, and breakthrough ideas—connected to the mental models and moves you can use.
3,456 entries
Genetic and environmental factors can contribute to complex traits, sometimes through interactions and correlations
Skip the probe because the answer isn't worth what it costs to get; stop or find a cheaper observation.
Skip the probe because the available test cannot detect a difference big enough to matter; redesign or act conservatively.
Skip the probe because no live action depends on the answer; clarify the decision or exit.
Skip the probe because you lack the consent, authority, or policy clearance to collect it.
Skip the probe because every plausible answer leads to the same action; act on the robust option and set a monitoring trigger.
Skip the probe because no feasible evidence can separate the rival explanations; decide by values, robustness, or reversibility instead.
Skip the probe because testing it creates disproportionate risk; use a safer proxy or protective action instead.
Skip the probe because waiting would violate an urgent safeguard; act or escalate first, collect only required monitoring.
The foundational logical distinction between conditions that are NECESSARY (must be present for something to occur, but don't guarantee it) and conditions that are SUFFICIENT (guarantee the outcome when present, but aren…
Spell out what has to come back and in what shape: the format, how detailed, by when, how certain it must be, and the specific test that makes it acceptable rather than merely finished. Not who decides, not what context went in.
Keats's negative capability concerns remaining with uncertainty and mystery without impatiently forcing an explanation, especially in literary imagination
The point at which additional input not only fails to improve output but actively makes it worse
Check whether anyone actively looked for counterexamples, nulls, and failures, or only collected the hits.
An interaction where total value is destroyed—all parties collectively end up with less than they started
Go inspect the failure, the outlier, the dropout, or the edge condition directly, because that is where the model breaks.
The tendency to respond to the POSSIBILITY of an event without regard to its PROBABILITY—reacting to whether something CAN happen rather than how LIKELY it is to happen
Every negotiation follows a predictable three-phase structure: opening (establishing positions and anchors), concession exchange (systematic movement toward agreement), and closing (final convergence and commitment)
When the other party uses hardball tactics—threats, ultimatums, personal attacks, extreme demands—the instinct is to respond in kind, escalating the conflict
Elite negotiators spend 80% of their time preparing and 20% at the table
Nemawashi (literally 'going around the roots' -- from the practice of preparing tree roots before transplanting) is the Japanese organizational practice of building informal consensus before any formal decision is made
Taleb's term for the systematic human bias toward the new over the time-tested—the reflexive assumption that newer means better
A special case of the Euler where every set sits wholly inside the next. Nothing crosses a boundary, so the drawing carries one fact repeatedly: each ring is a subset of the ring around it. It earns its space when the interesting number is how much falls away at each step inward.
The sum of all future cash flows discounted back to today's value using an appropriate discount rate